I received this letter from Comedy Central:

Dear Mr. King,

We're not a big fan of how you work our letters into your act. DO NOT do it again.

In furtherance of our talks to include yours among our stable of edgy comedy shows, we have had our attorneys, advertisers, and focus groups mark up your proposed material. Our suggested changes follow:

Your joke reads, "Hey. How come Congressmen are even still alive? Shouldn't we just kill them all immediately and drag their stinking corpses around Capitol Hill and hang their entrails from lampposts as a warning to incoming freshmen? ...That would clean up Washington pretty quick, don't you think?"

Instead, we suggest the following: "Hey. What's with the, uh, elephant symbol for the, um, Republicans? His trunk looks like a trumpet or something! Doo da doo! He's the bugler of freedom...freedom to suck a guy off in the bathroom! Ha ha ha!"

Now don't you think that's funny? And safe? Just change your act up a little bit. That's all we're asking. Don't disturb people. It's the secret to playing to worker drones whose lives are thrown into disarray when their favorite shows are preempted by ten minutes. "Know your audience," that's what we in the biz say.

We like your avant garde sense of race humor. But this one didn't pass our Knitting Moms focus group: "What's with all those Jews and their fangs plunged into the heart of this country?! Shouldn't we thrust a rifle in their hands so that they can fight all the wars they gin up? ...Now that's funny... Jews getting their hands dirty. ...They'd probably need a field therapist in addition to their MRE's."

We suggest the following, which still captures your edgy, rapier wit: "Those Jews... Can't stand 'em... When I'm at the movies, there's always one of 'em sitting down right in front of me... And who can see through that yarmulke of theirs?! ...Am I right? ...Can I hear it?"

So if you can incorporate some of our suggestions, let us know!

Sincerely,
Suits at Comedy Central (or Viacom or wherever we work that sucks.)

--------------------

I will poke fun at Jon Stewart. He's a stand-up comedian. He HAS to do material. It's killing him that his show isn't on. (I would not want my show to be interrupted by events outside my control, either.)

And, yes, I fully understand the nature of television. There are boundaries which your material must respect. There is a trade off. Show...business. Show...business. I get that part.

I may work at a gas station, but I consider myself the most fortunate comedian anywhere: I get to do whatever material I want. And that is why I consider the gas station job to be a perfect fit for me.

And not covering some of this material is not Jon Stewart's fault. It is the nature of the medium in which he operates. His show takes place on a respectable TV channel. My show takes place in a shit-hole bar that stinks of beer and piss. One's expectations will be different. "You're complaining about the material? Why are you even in this shit-hole bar? Go somewhere respectable where you belong."

So though I may tweak his prodigious nose, know that it's out of love.

The New Orcs

Associated Press President and CEO Tom Curley is highly skeptical of the U.S. military in its treatment of Pulitzer Prize-winning AP photographer Bilal Hussein, an Iraqi native who has been imprisoned for 19 months under suspicion of "links to insurgents."

In his Washington Post Op/Ed Railroading A Journalist In Iraq, Curley says that, despite Hussein never being charged with a crime, the military has kept him detained with claims, some trumped-up and others false; Curley believes that the real reason Hussein is being detained is because he was "taking photographs the U.S. government did not want its citizens to see."

...

"What is new this week," continues Tomlin, "is that after months of stonewalling, they propose on less than two weeks notice to drag him into a court room."

One incident Tomlin recalls suggests that Hussein was being set up. After Hussein was accused of being photographed with bomb-making equipment, evidence suggested that he was forced to stand for the photograph.

Link

The US Military has conducted themselves in a singularly dishonorable fashion. They are not suited to wearing loincloths, much less a United States uniform.

The purpose of a speedy, public trial is so that a man may be tried on the merits of evidence --evidence being facts that reflect reality, not staged photos. "Yup. Here I am. Just conveniently standing next to this bomb-making equipment while a guy takes my picture."

That the man has not received a trial indicates to me that there is no evidence. And if the trial must be secret, with loosened standards for evidence, this tells me that the military's case is a sham.

This is the new SOP, apparently: When hut dwellers have kicked your asses, lock up journalists.

You have lost the war, you have lost the nation, and you have lost your honor.

Remove the American flag from your sleeve. Your association with the decent has become an unseemly presumption.

Perfidy

perfidy

1592, from M.Fr. perfidie, from L. perfidia "falsehood, treachery," from perfidus "faithless," from phrase per fidem decipere "to deceive through trustingness," from per "through" (see per) + fidem, acc. of fides "faith" (see faith). The adj. perfidious is attested from 1598.

Online Etymology Dictionary, © 2001 Douglas Harper

--------
per·fi·dy (pûr'fĭ-dē) Pronunciation Key
n. pl. per·fi·dies

1. Deliberate breach of faith; calculated violation of trust; treachery: "the fink, whose perfidy was equaled only by his gall" (Gilbert Millstein).
2. The act or an instance of treachery.
   

[Latin perfidia, from perfidus, treacherous : per-, to destruction; see per- + fidēs, faith; see bheidh- in Indo-European roots.]

--dictionary.com

------------

You may get angry at a dog for biting you, but you can't really get angry at a dog for doing what it does naturally. You don't curse the knife for the sharpness of the blade, as they say.

I can, however, find more justification in being angry at a people who, at every turn, trade upon the confidences they had built with me to plunge the shiv in and take my wallet. Treachery + Destruction of Faith. Yup, that's them alright.

But I know that I have to temper my anger. Why? Because anger is not good for the soul or for the larger world.

This is something I had addressed earlier: The "informational certitude" of a thought is very close to that of 3-space reality. As you think, so it becomes. If you want a world full of love, you will love. If you want a world full of hate, you will hate.

When I quit that liquidation store job, I came home and roamed around muttering and positively spitting with rage. I was angrier than I had been in quite some time. Well, after about an hour of this, the mirror in the bathroom fell to the floor with a crash.

The mirror had hung there for two years. It hangs by a length of that braided picture wire that you buy at the hardware store. The wire is looped through an eye hook on each side. Then the wire is twisted 'round itself after it is passed through the hook.

The wire had unwound itself on one end, causing the mirror to fall.

Could this have happened by itself? Certainly. If you pull hard enough on a wire that is twisted 'round itself, it will unwind. And if the wire had not been twisted enough, perhaps the inexorable pull of the earth would have achieved this by itself. These things happen all the time.

But it is my job to notice things that others might overlook. I figure systems out. And then I fix them. It's what I do. I am very good at it. Make no mistake about that.

I will tell you: One informational state leads to one of the many possible successive informational states by way of an "informational bridge." My negative thoughts --and thoughts, remember, have an informational certitude very close to that of 3-space reality-- provided that bridge to the reality in which that mirror fell. My negative thoughts provided the extra "oomph" that gravity needed to unwind that wire.

One's thoughts can influence reality. Thoughts provide the bridge to the next economically plausible informational state. (And when I say "economically," I mean in the sense of energy or information --which are synonymous-- not money.)

So I have to be very careful not to be angry --though I have every reason to be so.

Now: I am an intelligent, well educated, mannered, generally placid person. And I am pissed off as all hell at Jews and their precious, perfidious homeland.

How do you expect the thug on the subway or the yahoo in the big, shiny truck to react when it becomes known that it was actually Israel and its lying minions who roam around defiling this land? Huh? ...And it will become known, because it's the truth. And the truth always comes out.

Do you people have a contingency plan? And, no, more lying does not constitute a contingency plan. I'm talking about redeeming yourselves. Do you have a plan to do this?

Your Redemption is nigh. You know that, right?

And, yes, I'm aware of the Beirut Marine barracks false-flag op.

And the USS Liberty thing.

Grunt Snort

Did they grunt like pigs before they fired?

Palestinian media sources announced Saturday death of two brothers in northern Gaza Strip, after the Israeli army opened fire on them near the Eritz checkpoint (Beit Hanoun crossing).

Dr. Moawiya Abu Hasanain, chief of emergency and ambulance department at the Palestinian health ministry, identified the killed as Ra'fat and Talal Abu Shraina, 40 and 41.

The health official confirmed that several bullets riddled in the victims' bodies, before they were pronounced dead.

Witnesses said that both Ra'fat and Talal, were rushing towards their farm land after they were informed that the Israeli army bulldozers were razing the land.

Witnesses added that the Israeli army opened fire at them, as they were attempting to prevent the bulldozers from razing their farmland.

Link

"Come visit our beautiful troglodyte nation! ...Everyone hates us and we don't know why..."

"You see, in our Barnyard Animal Law, we can kill non-Jews because they're not really human."

That's funny, because it's becoming more and more apparent that it's Jews who are the complete animals of the world. Grunt Snort

You must journalists or something.

By KEVIN CROWE and GUIDO H. STEMPEL III
Scripps Howard News Service
Friday, November 23, 2007

Nearly two-thirds of Americans think it is possible that some federal officials had specific warnings of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on New York and Washington, but chose to ignore those warnings, according to a Scripps Howard News Service/Ohio University poll.

A national survey of 811 adult residents of the United States conducted by Scripps and Ohio University found that more than a third believe in a broad smorgasbord of conspiracy theories including the attacks, international plots to rig oil prices, the plot to assassinate President John F. Kennedy in 1963 and the government's knowledge of intelligent life from other worlds.

The high percentage is a manifestation, some say, of an American public that increasingly distrusts the federal government.

Distrust it? Who would ever do such a mean, ol' thing in light of its completely lawful behavior?

"The kind of anxieties or mistrust of the government that might have been expressed as a belief in UFOs has shifted," said political science professor Jodi Dean. "Now people are worried about things that are much realer to them."

Yeah. And the fact that people said, "Oh, we hear bombs going off inside the building." Not to mention the slight, niggling fact the it wasn't, um, theoretically possible for burning jet fuel to collapse a steel-framed building. But who's counting.

But one decades-old theory continues to thrive. Forty-two percent of the American public still thinks some people in the federal government might have known about the assassination of Kennedy in advance.

"I'm amazed that it's as high as it is," said Vincent Bugliosi, whose 1,632-page book "Reclaiming History: The Assassination of President John F. Kennedy" was published in May.

Yeah. I'm amazed that Mister Buglioni, Bugliosity, whatever, didn't know that E. Howard Hunt said on his deathbed, "Oh, by the way, I was in on the Kennedy assassination."

Facts are often useful when writing an article.

Link

Harold Budd, Brian Eno

Grasping at vaporware.

It does not have the drama of the Inchon landing or the sweep of the Union comeback in the summer of 1864. But the turnabout of American fortunes in Iraq over the past several months is of equal moment -- a war seemingly lost, now winnable. The violence in Iraq has been dramatically reduced. Political allegiances have been radically reversed. The revival of ordinary life in many cities is palpable. Something important is happening.

And what is the reaction of the war critics? Nancy Pelosi stoutly maintains her state of denial, saying this about the war just two weeks ago: "This is not working. . . . We must reverse it." A euphemism for "abandon the field," which is what every Democratic presidential candidate is promising, with variations only in how precipitous to make the retreat.

Link

I'm guessing that Army readiness is somewhere around twenty-five percent. The United States no longer has an army. How is this considered winning?

When you invade a territory against the wishes of the armed inhabitants, you will lose. This is basic stuff. No need to attend a war college to divine this truth.

It has been accounted that the cost of this misadventure is around two trillion dollars. I suspect that years from now, when all the figures have been added up, the final cost will be closer to ten trillion.

"We spent ten trillion dollars fixing things we broke while bumbling around looking for slickly marketed non-threats. And we destroyed the moral authority of the United States in the process, causing it to lose political authority and, thus, causing it to destroy itself. Strike up the band; we won!"

The economics of technology make it ever more possible for rice farmers and hut dwellers to lay an army low.

You walked in there. That you have risen to your knees after being flat on your backs is not a victory.

I love war. I love battle. I love the spirit of the contest. This Iraqi Misadventure was launched by those who know absolutely nothing about warfare.

Get back in your stall.

Federal officials are routinely asking courts to order cellphone companies to furnish real-time tracking data so they can pinpoint the whereabouts of drug traffickers, fugitives and other criminal suspects, according to judges and industry lawyers.

In some cases, judges have granted the requests without requiring the government to demonstrate that there is probable cause to believe that a crime is taking place or that the inquiry will yield evidence of a crime. Privacy advocates fear such a practice may expose average Americans to a new level of government scrutiny of their daily lives.

Link

Some in my audience believe me on this point, others do not: The federal "government" acts wholly in and on behalf of moneyed interests. The government isn't for you. You have not had lawful government since at least 1913. (When organized monetary theft was legalized with the Federal Reserve Act.) The FBI, for example, acts for bankers who hate the Liberty Dollar because they cannot counterfeit it.

And this "fugitives and other criminal suspects" bit? That HR 1959 bill effectively makes political dissent illegal. That makes "criminals" out of any who would express political dissent like "maybe war isn't such a good idea." This cellphone tracking makes it possible to locate someone for easy snatching off the street.

The "government" can designate anyone a criminal.

"Drug traffickers! Baby eaters! Mother humpers and father rapers! ...And, uh, other criminal suspects, like, um... you."

The federal "government" operates exclusively in two modes:

1. As an instrument of coercion for the gain of an organized crime syndicate, while
2. Throwing a few bones to the people to make them think that it works for them.

Some would say, "Chris, you're silly. Aren't you being a little paranoid? You would allow your friends and family to track you by your cellphone... Why not the government? We're here to protect you... From the drugs. And the terriss."

Yeah, I've heard this argument before. Just a couple differences here: One, I can turn the tracking feature off and can also decide who among my circle may track me, and, two, my friends and family do not consider gang rape and waterboarding and (forced) cum eating to be appropriate behavior.

I am willing to give friends and family a key to my house. I would not extend the same privilege to the village troglodytes, who have demonstrated themselves unsuited for polite company.

Government employees have conducted themselves as animals. Let them stay in the barn. But do not EVER allow them into the house.

They're Demons!

An updated John Carpenter classic, "They Live."

They have substance eaters too, I guess.

British MEPs have reacted with outrage to a planned Euro-census which would demand details about every woman's sexual partners.

UK Independence Party MEP Derek Clark urged women to protest by claiming they are virgins or have 1,000 sexual partners if the proposal is approved.

The proposed new European Commission power to collect facts and figures on population and housing across the EU would go further than any national census, Mr Clark warned.

The information the Commission wants to be allowed to gather includes information on the "consensual unions" of all women in the EU.

Link

See, customers of those old-fashioned, uppity, fuddy-duddy "states" have to submit to all kinds of stupid stuff.

I'm looking over my agreement with USov. It says here:

"Should any United Sovereigns of America employee ever demand to know how many people you've fucked, you are within your rights to drive a fist right through their face. Then we'll fire that employee. Why do you have this right? Because we want your business. You could easily hire someone else in this new age of the absence of territorial jurisdiction. Thanks."

My TV Show

For any newcomers, the video portion of my show may be found here:

http://link.brightcove.com/services/player/bcpid1137855670

Any videos that I produce will show up there.

For any who do not know what RSS is:

Once the player displays, please note the "MENU" button at the lower right corner of the video itself. Click it. Several options will show up over the video. Click the one that looks like radio waves or something. This allows you to subscribe to the RSS feed. (If you do this, then your web browser will automatically tell you when I have published a new video. Firefox, for example, will notify you. I don't know if Microsoft Internet Explorer does this.) Anyway: If you then click the "Subscribe using feed" button, your browser will automatically subscribe to the feed.

Damien Rice

I just stumbled upon this guy the other day.

My first item for sale:

One white pair of jockey-style underwear, purchased as part of a 3-pak at the liquidation store. Yellow stain in front. Price: $10,000.

Please send a check to the PO box. I will sign the article upon request for an additional $5000.

I have seized upon a new revenue model.

I don't know why I didn't think of this before.

I will lovingly produce by my own hand physical objects that people can buy. People like to hold things in their hands and possess them and drain the very life force from them and trot them out at parties.

I will sign each work and it will come with a certificate of authenticity that reads:

THIS IS A CERTIFIED PIECE OF SHIT THAT CHRIS KING POP ICON PRODUCED. IT IS THE EQUIVALENT OF SELLING DRINKS TO PEOPLE WHO OTHERWISE WOULD ONLY EAT THE FREE PRETZELS AND FART.

PLEASE ENJOY YOUR NEW ACQUISITION.

REM - Harborcoat

From on around 1984, if I remember correctly.

The ramshackle house and the junk in the yard reminds me of something I would see in Vermont. But it's beautiful in its way.

I would have been interested in this case five years ago.

But now it's moot.

The Supreme Court announced yesterday that it will determine whether the District of Columbia's strict firearms law violates the Constitution, a decision that will raise the politically and culturally divisive issue of gun control just in time for the 2008 elections.

The court's examination of the meaning of the Second Amendment for the first time in nearly 70 years carries broad implications for gun-control measures locally and across the country.

Link

Since there no longer is such a thing as territorial jurisdiction, any decision would apply only to members of the political unions in question. So you could have a member of PPU New York and PPU USov walking side-by-side down the street in any territory. The PPU New York member would be prohibited from carrying a sidearm whereas the USov member would have that right.

It's an interesting aspect of this New Political Landscape.

Some campaign slogans.

"There isn't a fluffy pen in Chris King Pop Icon's My Little Pony purse. Just another fist."

"My plan to get the Jews to shut the fuck up? Four words: Chris King Pop Icon."

-----------

"There's no chin behind Chuck Norris' beard... only another fist."

The other Republican candidates may have more money and better poll numbers, but Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee isn’t worried about any of that. He is the only GOP contender who can claim support of the imposing force that is Chuck Norris.

In a new TV ad set to begin airing this week in Iowa, Huckabee appears alongside the action movie star and cult icon with a warning for voters.

“Chuck Norris doesn’t endorse. He tells America how it’s gonna be,” Huckabee says in the new ad.

After cleaning up the Lone Star state as “Walker: Texas Ranger,” and fighting terrorists in “Delta Force,” Norris is taking his roundhouse kicks to the campaign trail on Huckabee’s behalf. If Norris can turn Barry Gabrewski from bully victim to karate champion, he’s certainly a good “Sidekick” to have.

While Norris tells viewers Huckabee’s plans to “protect our 2nd Amendment rights” and “put the IRS out of business,” the candidate shares some insights about the movie star.

“My plan to secure the border? Two words: Chuck Norris,” Huckabee says.

Link

Come again? My robotic arms are too noisy for me to hear you.

PITTSBURGH (KDKA) ―

The U.S. Military is demanding that thousands of wounded service personnel give back signing bonuses because they are unable to serve out their commitments.

To get people to sign up, the military gives enlistment bonuses up to $30,000 in some cases.

Now men and women who have lost arms, legs, eyesight, hearing and can no longer serve are being ordered to pay some of that money back.

Link

I suggest that we enact a special Bat Mitzvah Tax. What's that? Say you want to put on a disgusting spectacle of excess for your precious daughter. (Preferably with ten million dollars of embezzled money.) If your disgusting spectacle costs more than $500, you pay ten percent to compensate the military for the signing bonuses of veterans who can't complete their terms due to their artificial limbs, glass eyes, and colostomy bags.

I certainly hope no veteran has paid Dime One back. If I were to receive a such a letter, I would regard it as so out of line that it must be a clerical error of some sort. I would throw it in the trash where it belongs.

I want to have spoken my final cross word about Jews.

But here's what angers me:

You come home to find your girlfriend beaten unconscious and raped.

Your best friend, who is forever lamenting that everyone hates him and he doesn't know why, fingers someone. So you go completely apeshit on that someone. Your buddy is egging you on the whole way.

Well... Come to find out... It was your alleged best friend who did it.

So you can see why I would go completely apeshit on Jews. Right about now, all I can do when I even see a Jew is to roll my eyes.

Thanks for completely fucking up my relationships with Jews.

And you knew who it was... You somehow knew... You had your suspicions... You heard the whispers. You knew what your troglodyte nation was all about.

Will you redeem yourselves? I doubt it. But if you wanted to, you could start by scaling back on that disgusting spectacle known as the bat mitzvah (paid for with 10 mill in embezzled money) and buy that veteran a new fake leg. Or that veteran with a scar-tissue face and that amorphous hole where his mouth used to be? Buy him a new face so he can find himself a girlfriend.

I don't like bad blood. So I will forgive you. But it's gonna take some effort on my part. Forgive me if I seem angry sometimes.

So if the very notion of territorial jurisdiction was extinguished,

what is the practical result for the states' Lovingly Compiled Compendia of Shit-Caked Pieces of Paper?

Let's take this as an example: The State of Vermont says that bars within its territory may not permit smoking. (The State cannot perform its most basic functions, so it busies itself with flashy crowd-pleasers like this.) This prohibition exists despite the fact that neither the proprietor of the bar nor the patrons may have a problem with it.

In the absence of territory, the law has no effect.

The State's agents will likely try to enforce the law. I would imagine that the bar owner's PPU security will be successful in convincing the State's agents to go home without causing a scene.

"Yeah, that's a silly law anyway."

"Not to mention that you no longer have jurisdiction. There is a cost associated with not performing your assigned function, you know. Your customer is now ours. Goodbye."

And in the absence of territory (a component of the definition of a "state") the states become merely PPU's, operating on a similar moral footing with any other PPU's within the territory.

Let's do a comparison, using the State of Vermont (for no particular antagonistic reason) and United Sovereigns of America:



PPU of Vermont's Customers:

• Require permission to work.
• Require permission to travel.
• Pay yearly fees equal to income, sales, and property taxes.
• May not smoke in bars.
• May not grow the wonder crop and wonder food known as hemp.
• Get finger-fucked on demand.

USA's Customers:

• Require no man's permission to work.
• Require no man's permission to travel.
• Pay $5000 per year in fees.
• Can smoke in bars, if the proprietor permits it.
• Are free to do what they please, assuming that such action does not run counter to USA's guidelines or its Interoperability Agreements with other PPU's.
• Are free to drive a .45 round into the face of any who would finger-fuck them.

As you can imagine, the PPU's will siphon away the customers of the states until the states' only customers are the welfare recipients. This will cause budgetary problems. Bye bye, states.

There is a cost associated with not performing your assigned function.

"Chris! This PPU scheme is unworkable! We'll have lawlessness!"

What do you think we have now?

It's a new world, everyone. Wake up, open your eyes, and move forward. Yesterday is gone.

It would be an interesting exercise--

--for some enterprising economics student to calculate the amount of wealth stolen each year through fractional reserve banking.

It would go something like this: The amount of cash and savings and checkings deposits in Cootersville is ten million dollars. (We exclude real estate and stocks and bonds and the like because, despite the value of the currency in which they are traded, they will still retain their value.) If the money supply is increased (inflated) by five percent in a year, then it would seem that five hundred thousand dollars were stolen from the people of Cootersville by the Penny Shiners and their conspirators in "government."

It is difficult to calculate the theft because the Penny Shiners have made the M3 figure a big secret.

Just imagine: It's like the Russkies in 1950 driving tanks down the street and stealing five percent of the savings of Americans at gunpoint each year. Would you be outraged? Fractional reserve banking is just an elegant scheme of thievery. And it's less detectable by the common man than anything those nasty, ol' Russkies could dream up.

What would Americans' standard of living be like today if some foreign power had not been stealing a certain percentage of your wealth each year?

Betcha they'd take LIberty Dollars.

The Taj Mahal may have been built as a testament to love but some hard-headed business decisions are now holding sway at India's most famous monument. First among them is that the US dollar is no longer welcome.

With parts of the American economy in turmoil and the dollar rapidly losing its long-held position as the currency of choice, Indian authorities have calculated they are losing considerable sums of money by allowing foreign tourists to pay using greenbacks.

Link

Now you see why the FBI wants them out of business.

Have you sold your interest in that pig currency yet?

Buying gold coins is easy: Pick one: American Eagles, Canadian Maple Leafs, Krugerrands, Pandas, or even the Liberty Dollar. The price you will pay will be somewhere around three percent above the "spot price" of gold. Go here to check out the prevailing prices: kitco.com

And eventually the US "government" will make owning and trading in gold coins illegal. They'll say that the Terriss use gold coins. But what they're really doing is forbidding the use of gold coins so that their penny-shining masters' pig currency will still have some value. They'll try to seize your gold coins, so DO NOT keep them in a safe-deposit box.

The US "government" will brand you a terriss for owning coins. The proper response at that point is, "Please fuck off immediately."

Everything except the bars.

Music for this show.

Don't forget: This show has music. If you use the pay Yahoo music service, you can hear the playlist here:

http://yme.music.yahoo.com/ymjNav/2.0/ymu/playlist/9D673E1A-848E-4B31-BD4B-A1F83C7846A0

Well at least someone's got balls around here.

John McCain often says on the campaign trail that he wants to take on the system in Washington. Usually, he's talking about congressional spending and pork-barrel projects. But he also wants to challenge the system of protection that forces presidents to live life in a bubble.

"It's my intention, if we win this nomination, to reject Secret Service," he said during one of his many conversations with reporters on his Straight Talk Express this weekend. "Why do I need it?"

Link

OK. I've got the patch on now.

And there's no more alcohol allowed in the house.

I'm a new man. Ta da!

And this FBI raid on NORFED,

where our investigative finest seized Ron Paul coins, occurred because bankers don't like the competition. Why, for example, would I traffic in garbage money (that bankers are free to counterfeit through fractional reserve banking) when I could store my wealth in an easily recognizable, durable, attractive coin of real metal that cannot be counterfeited?

The bankers are using their playthings in the FBI to put their competitors out of business. The bankers want to force me to use a currency that they can counterfeit.

Bankers ABSOLUTELY HATE gold and silver coins because it is impossible to counterfeit them.

Here is a short primer on money.

The first "bankers" were goldsmiths. Why? Presumably because they had the vaults and the security to protect their own gold. Customers started asking them to hold their gold for them. The goldsmith would issue a note indicating that the customer had a certain amount of gold in the goldsmith's vault.

Well, customers soon realized that instead of needing to return to claim their gold when they wished to purchase something from a merchant, that merchant would simply accept the note. The merchant, after all, could present that note at the goldsmith and claim the gold.

Pretty soon, few people were claiming the gold --which they would have to carry around and perhaps risk losing. They just passed notes among themselves. There is nothing wrong with this system. Everyone is performing admirably and honorably.

Ten notes in circulation indicates ten pieces of gold in the vault. Ten units of money are in circulation, ten are out of circulation. The money supply is equal to ten units of money. (In this example, there are ten notes in circulation and zero coins in circulation.) Should someone redeem a note, that note is retired (taken out of circulation) and a piece of gold is taken out of the vault and given to the customer (put into circulation.) The money supply is still equal to ten units of money, comprised of nine notes and one coin. The money supply is stable. The value of the note is stable.

But of course there is always someone looking to steal.

The goldsmiths noticed that no one would find out if they issued the occasional extra note and then lent it to someone. "Hey: How about making me a low-cost loan? It won't cost you much since all you have to do is print up another note. It's not like you had to go dig up the gold or anything... Who's gonna know that I didn't deposit a coin with you?" So the goldsmith would put one additional note, one additional unit of money, into circulation.

So let's erase the blackboard and go back to the beginning and say that the money supply is ten units of money: Ten notes in circulation that represent ten coins out of circulation. Now the goldsmith issues one additional note, one additional unit of money. The money supply has been expanded by one unit of money. There are eleven notes in circulation and ten coins out of circulation. The money supply has been inflated. Who benefited? The banker (who makes interest for doing nothing) and the immediate borrower (who gets to borrow money at an interest rate that is lower than what it would cost him to borrow real money from a private person.)

Both parties receive real economic value from this act. But energy cannot be created or destroyed. Where did the energy come from? That energy comes from the legitimate notes, whose legitimacy this fake note has appropriated.

This additional note, unbacked by anything, travels among the other notes, pretending to be worth something. And no one can really tell since the goldsmith is not going to permit anyone to take an inventory of his vault. Would the value of the notes in circulation fall? Not immediately.

Now let's pretend that we're talking about the money supply of a town. Cootersville. There are a hundred people in this town. They all do business with one bank. The First National Bank of Cootersville. All the townspeople have deposited their gold coins in this bank and gotten notes. (Who wants to carry around all those heavy coins?) The money supply is equal to one million units of money.

The bank president realizes that people rarely redeem the notes for gold. He's got a buddy, a building contractor. He builds houses. He wants to borrow money from someone to build a housing complex, but people in the town are asking ten percent on their money. So the contractor asks his buddy at the bank if he could, you know, issue a few more notes. "Who's gonna know?"

The bank president prints up some more notes and issues them to the builder. The notes are in the amount of 100,000 units of money. They claim to represent 100, 000 pieces of gold. The banker charges an interest rate that is less than the market rate. Why? Because if he charged a rate equal to the market rate, then the builder would have no reason to borrow from the banker; he might as well borrow in the free market of the townspeople, who are charging ten percent on their money. So the banker charges something less: say, eight percent. Ding! Take note of this artificially altered price of credit; we'll come back to it. And note that the money supply has been inflated from one million units of money to 1.1 million units. Imposters now circulate among the real money.

Now the builder has his money. He spends it into circulation by buying building materials, paying workers, etc. The workers and the hardware store suddenly have lots of business. Everyone seems to have more money. And they do: they are the recipients of this new 100,000 units of money.

Now let's say I'm a farmer and I've got some cows to sell. I put an advertisement in the paper saying that I will have a livestock auction on Saturday. Ten people show up to bid on the cows. Typically, a cow will sell for about a hundred units of money. But now Jim Bob (who had always wanted a cow but could not afford one) has shown up at the auction. He's a drywall guy and has been doing some work for the builder. He now has money. Jimmy Joe (who typically comes to the auctions and buys cows sometimes because he is a dairy farmer) is now bidding against Jim Bob. Jim Bob has the money to buy a cow now. But Jimmy Joe, the dairy farmer, still needs that cow. So Jimmy Joe is forced to raise his bid by some amount.

That cow I just sold to Jimmie Joe cost him more than the cow I sold to Jimmie Joe last week. This is price inflation. It is a direct result of monetary inflation.

The elderly widow down the street --whose entire savings amount to ten thousand units of money-- must now pay more to buy the chickens from me because Jim Bob Drywall Guy also wants to buy chickens with his newfound "wealth." The value of the widow's money has decreased.

The "energy content" of the builder's fake money came from the widow's money. And from the dairy farmer's money. It was a transference of wealth from the widow and the dairy farmer and to the builder. (And also to the banker, as he is making some money by way of his interest.)

This fractional reserve banking scheme cooked up by the bank president is a theft of wealth from existing holders of money. The fruits of this theft are divided between the banker and those to whom he lends the fake money. This scheme of thievery always requires two conspirators: the banker and the initial borrower. (Who is likely the banker's buddy.)

Now. Back to that altered interest rate. To recap: The townspeople would charge ten percent on their money. Ten percent is the cost of credit in Cootersville. If the banker chooses to issue additional notes to the builder, he must charge a lesser rate than the prevailing rate, else why would the builder borrow money from the banker when he could just get it from the townspeople? The banker wants to lend this money. So he will charge less than the prevailing rate. That is, he will charge less than the market has decided that the price of credit is worth.

The banker has lowered the price of credit.

Let's say I'm an inventor. I invent everything from retrotemporal communications devices to battery-powered tie racks to nuclear-powered mouse traps.

The old style, spring-loaded mouse trap seems to work just fine. And it costs ninety-nine cents. I would never borrow money at ten percent to build a factory to manufacture nuclear-powered mouse traps. Why would anyone do such a thing when someone can buy a spring-loaded mouse trap for ninety-nine cents?

But let's say I've got my heart set on this cockamamie idea of a world improved by nuclear-powered mouse traps. In my financial calculus, a credit price of ten percent makes the idea unworkable. But what if the price of credit were only eight percent? Or five percent? Or one percent? In my financial calculus, my bright idea of building a factory to manufacture nuclear-powered mouse traps suddenly seems viable.

So I borrow the money from the banker at an artificially reduced price of five percent. And away I go and build my factory and buy stuff from the local uranium miner (who has to hire more people and dig up uranium and buy packaging material so that he can ship it to me and he prints up his special stationery so that he can bill me.) The uranium miner has created an entire business around providing me with uranium for my nuclear-powered mouse traps.

So opening day comes! ...And no one seems interested in a nuclear-powered mouse trap. So the economic energy that was stolen from the dairy farmer and the widow has been put to use in building a nuclear-powered mouse trap factory and in expanding the uranium miner's operation. I'm not selling mouse traps and the miner isn't selling any more uranium than he was before. So now the economy of Cootersville has an idle nuclear-powered mouse trap factory and lots of fancy stationery that aren't being used. This is an economic distortion. Such a thing would not have occurred if the credit were purchased at the prevailing rate.

An artificially low price of credit makes all sorts of cockamamie ideas seem economically viable. And we wind up with WebVan and Pets.com. ...And we're out a cure for cancer or an expanded cotton-growing operation or whatever else the credit might have been wisely applied to.

Fractional reserve banking has two effects, both of which are deleterious to an economy: It steals economic value from the dairy farmer and the widow, and it encourages unwise investment.

Fractional reserve banking is theft, plain and simple. It is the single worst thing that ever happened to Cootersville.

...But there is no shortage of sophists to argue in favor of it. Because they are very well paid. Fractional reserve banking is a VERY lucrative business.

I'm so not getting a TV show.

And you know what? I really don't care. The nature of the medium is probably such that I would be limited to doing meaningless material.

Dershowitz is a member of the Traveling Jewish Hucksters. They roam from society to society and ruin them. He's an ex-communist. He likes authoritarian systems of government.

And I think if you were to look closely, you would find that he's a satanist. Which means he's not actually Jewish.

Let's look at this impressive passage again:

"If you torture, then what separates you from -- the Nazis, or somebody else?" asked Brzezinski.

"Every government faced with a ticking bomb would, in fact, torture, and we would do it in order to get information to save lives," Dershowitz answered. "The essence of a democracy, if you're going to do something, you have to admit you're doing it and you have to have control over it and you have to have restrictions on when it can be done. ... If it's going to be done in a democracy, then you have to make everybody accountable for it."

"It's been found that torture doesn't cough up good information at all times," Brzezinski pointed out.

"That's just dead wrong," Dershowitz stammered. "It works sometimes."

Link

This is pure, meaningless sophistry. I didn't know that admitting you're doing something and then making everyone accountable for it if you're going to do something was the "essence of democracy."

The man sells garbage for a living. And should a society be so unfortunate as to buy it, that society gets destroyed. (Much like American society is now.)

Bill Kristol is another member of the Traveling Jewish Hucksters. All he can do is smile that creepy smile of his and spew forth lies.

Nearly every Jew I've seen on TV for the past six years is a member of the Traveling Jewish Hucksters. They defile the minds of their audiences merely by opening their mouths.

And the sad part here is that they're not even Jewish.

The Traveling Jewish Hucksters have some kind of communal psychic sickness. They despise themselves, they despise life, and they despise beautiful things. So it is their calling to spread poison.

And the Jews permit them to do business from their house.

It's always something with you people, isn't it?

"I agree," said Dershowitz. "I think we should take a stand on waterboarding. We should say, never should it be permitted as a routine matter."

He then cited the hypothetical "ticking bomb" situation, arguing that any leader would order torture under those circumstances, so "we're just kidding ourselves by putting the issue underneath the table and coming up with extreme statements that we know we would never follow in practice."

"If you torture, then what separates you from -- the Nazis, or somebody else?" asked Brzezinski.

"Every government faced with a ticking bomb would, in fact, torture, and we would do it in order to get information to save lives," Dershowitz answered. "The essence of a democracy, if you're going to do something, you have to admit you're doing it and you have to have control over it and you have to have restrictions on when it can be done. ... If it's going to be done in a democracy, then you have to make everybody accountable for it."

Link

You know what I think? I think we should start tattooing Jews. That way we can know who is suited to pumping sewage and spreading manure and being the world's prostitutes.

Can you people please get your Nazi contingent in line?

I would like to explain the concept that I call "informational primacy."

It's the state of being the tallest mountain. Or the brightest light. It is the state of being so "famous" that you become known to the Future People --who, with the passage of time, become the Present People.

And everyone HAS to watch your show, because it is THE show.

In short, informational primacy is fame.

It means nothing to me other than its usefulness as a tool.

I chose stand-up comedy as a vehicle because fine comedians are rare. According to the formula by which I operate, I had to work to become a fine comedian SO THAT I could achieve informational primacy. I am counting on being very famous. I have to be famous. It's my tool. It is part of four-dimensional chess.

Being very famous is by now a foregone conclusion. It cannot be stopped. This informational "critical mass" has been achieved. It just needs to be released at my convenience.

The New World Order is dead. I killed it. But that occurs in a "pro-temporal frame," if that makes sense to you. We will have those who do not yet know that they work for people who have lost.

I would ask of the Future People to closely examine henceforth the video footage of Sean Hannity, for example. He reads my material. He knows that I have asked you to look into his eyes. So now, every time he looks into the camera, he will know that he is being scrutinized by generations of viewers who know what to look for. He will know that we can see the fear in his eyes.

He knows all too well that, without intervention, he is doomed. It will be hard for his unconscious mind not to beg forgiveness and to let the Freudian slips out. He will utter at some point, for example, the words "I am America's enemy."

And now he can't stop thinking about this. He can't stop trying not to say the words "I am America's enemy." Which is why he will utter them: Because the words occupy his every unconscious thought and represent the only avenue for his forgiveness.

Your unconscious mind, Mr. Hannity, will first confess your crimes. And then I will heal you.

Do you know who I am yet?

My trifecta of toxins.

Smoking weed makes you want to drink. Drinking makes you want to smoke cigarettes. Which makes you want to smoke more weed. It was an accelerating flywheel that threatened to self-destruct, perhaps taking out the entirety of 3-space with it.

So I quit the weed. (I'll treat myself now and again, but I consider myself not to have been a "smoker" for about a year now.)

Now I'm on the patch. Or will be, as soon as I have a few more cigarettes this morning before going to work.

And then it's doing away with the booze.

"Don't worry, everybody! I clean up real good!"

H.R. 1955 is EXTREMELY dangerous.

It provides for snatching people up for "extremist belief systems." This is the legal mechanism by which dissenters vanish into a hole somewhere.

THIS BILL MUST BE STOPPED DEAD IN ITS TRACKS.

If this bill becomes law, then freedom of speech, dissent, and petition disappear.

This bill's appearance is contemporaneous with the coordinated talking points of Shawn Hannity, Bill O'Reilly, Glenn Beck, Michael Weiner Savage, Rush Limbaugh, among others.

These people work for those who are conquering your country. Their job is to talk stuff up.

More info

"Five, four, three, two..."

Any stage illusionist knows that it is supremely easy to mesmerize an audience. And once you have them hypnotized, you can make them do anything: quack like ducks, walk funny, roll around on the floor, hand you their wallets...

I will tell you as a social observer --because I have at no time ever been part of your society, nor susceptible to the methods used against it-- that over the past six years you have been flapping your arms and making duck noises. And all I can do is shake my head at your performance.

Your entire society has been hypnotized. And you are doing some very dangerous things to yourselves for the benefit of your hypnotizers.

Here is a list of your stunning achievements over the past six years:

• You kill hundreds of thousands of peaceful people for no discernible reason.
• You torture people.
• You make fathers fuck their sons in your gulags.
• You make people eat each other's cum.
  
• You depopulate entire swaths of land by salting it with depleted uranium.
• You have allowed the public treasury to be completely looted.
• You have delivered to an organized crime syndicate free access to your communications.
• You have dismantled your system of law.
• You take off your shoes at the airport and are permitted one travel-sized tube of toothpaste in a see-through bag.
• You have video cameras everywhere.
• Cops tase unconscious people for not obeying orders to wake up and college kids for asking questions.
• You have delivered to the Executive branch permission to whisk anyone away never to be seen again.
  

Bravo. [slow, sarcastic clapping]

You have been taken advantage of by illusionists. They are nothing but traveling hucksters. They go from society to society and ruin them. It's what they do. Like the people known as "the travelers," that clan that travels from city to city and swindles the elderly by promising to make house repairs or whatever, these illusionists do the same thing. They did it to Russia, they did it to Germany, and now they're doing it to America.

Each people specializes in something: The Germans make fine cars, the Swiss produce chocolate, the Japanese make robots. Others ruin societies. It's their preferred business model. Someone has to do it, I suppose. There will always be traveling snake-oil salesmen.

There's only one person who can wake up an illusionist's audience: Another illusionist. Two can play that game...

In this case there is one phrase that will act as a snapping of fingers, one phrase that will wake you up, one phrase that will cause the entire illusion to evaporate:

"Israel did it."

If I can utter that phrase --and provide proof to back it up-- then you will wake from your slumber, the entire ruse will be visible, you will see your enemy, and Abe Foxman's head will explode in a massive supernova of brains.

Although I do suspect that Jews would make a delectable, tasty treat, that's not my main motivator. My goal over the past four years has been to utter that one magic phrase.

Israel is a satanic state. It exists as an insult to God. According to Jews themselves, it is an abomination and was not to be formed prior to the Messianic Redemption.

To be fair, "Jewish" satanists --again, a misnomer because, by definition, Jews do not worship Satan-- these Jewish satanists have plenty of co-workers of other lineages. I have chosen my attack carefully and made the cool decision that the "Israel did it" phrase was the most direct route. Israeli complicity in 9-11 is, in my judgment, the weak link in the chain.

That is why I have done so much Jew material over the past three years. I had to navigate past their defenses. (Though I will concede that it was tremendously fun to give them a righteous beatdown.) I have managed to perform that material without being credibly accused of being ContraThem. Now I'm inside the control room, and there are no more defenses. All their guns are pointed outward. There's no one left guarding the inner sanctum. I'm stomping around and pulling wires and watching the sparks fly. And all I have to do at my leisure is to find the right wire to yank. ...And then it's all over.

I will find that smoking gun that causes the heads of Abe Foxman, Michael Chertoff, Michael Mukasey, and Joseph Lieberman to pop like an overripe, neglected pimple that spills its fruits upon receiving so much as a kind whisper.

And I am close to diagnosing the Jews' problem: There is a dark sect that walks among them. This sect ruins societies. It's their business model. This sect gives Jews a bad name.

And I will expose that sect for the malevolent hypnotists that they are.

Five, four, three, two...

Margarine hates butter.

Federal agents on Thursday raided the Evansville, Ind., headquarters of the National Organization for the Repeal of the Federal Reserve Act and Internal Revenue Code (Norfed), an organization of "sound money" advocates that for the past decade has been selling a private currency it calls "Liberty Dollars." The company says it has put into circulation more than $20 million in Liberty Dollars, coins and paper certificates it contends are backed by silver and gold stored in Idaho, are far more reliable than a U.S. dollar and are accepted for use by a nationwide underground economy.

...

In the affidavit, an FBI special agent states that he is investigating Norfed for federal violations including "uttering coins of gold, silver, or other metal," "making or possessing likeness of coins," mail fraud, wire fraud, money laundering and conspiracy. "The goal of Norfed is to undermine the United States government's financial systems by the issuance of a non-governmental competing currency for the purpose of repealing the Federal Reserve and Internal Revenue Code," he states.

Link

I suspect that if you look closely at whatever statute the FBI claims to derive the "uttering coins" and "making or possessing likeness of coins" phrases, you will find that the statute defines "coins" to be United States coins. That is, it would be illegal to strike coins that purport to be United States coins.

These Liberty coins could only be mistaken for US coins by a complete moron. ...Which I know is most Americans, but still.

By the FBI's misleading and fraudulent use of that statute, they would seem to be obligated to seize the assets of the Franklin Mint and jail them for striking commemorative Snow White coins or World Fair 1968 coins or whatever.

The government's case is asinine.

Is it legal to trade a broken-down but fixable truck for three cords of firewood?

Yes.

Is it legal to trade a gold nugget you found in the river for three cords of firewood?

Yes.

Is it legal to melt that nugget of gold into a flat, circular disc and shine it up and trade that for three cords of firewood?

Yes.

Is it legal to strike an image of Mickey Mouse onto the disc and trade it for the firewood? (There would some copyright infringement, but you get the point. Come up with your own symbol or image.) Can you do this?

Yes.

As a matter of fact, companies have been doing this centuries. They're called assayers. Such an image on a coin is like a trademarked symbol. It tells any who might trade with such a coin that this particular company has certified that the silver or gold is of a guaranteed weight and fineness.

There is nothing illegal about this.

It would be illegal, however, if you struck a coin that purported to be a United States coin.

So, as usual, the FBI is misusing statutes to achieve some political end. These aren't quite the Ephraim Zimbalist Junior heydays of law enforcement.

And that end is to drive real money out of circulation so that the garbage money will have no competition.

My show will be a hybrid.

I have decided: My show will be text-heavy but will include special-treat video pieces. This format is well suited to various cost structures that are particular to my situation. (I have no production crew, I like to write, blogs are low-cost, etc.)

The video pieces will be done when I have my "funny shirt" on. A funny shirt is the shirt that, when you put it on, just magically makes you funny. Other comedians know what I'm talking about: When you're in that mood where you can't NOT be funny. But I'm not always in that mood; I don't always have my funny shirt on. And stuff that you do when you don't have your funny shirt on is just garbage.

In comedy, anyone can be resurrected.

The comedian can make anyone a friend again. He can make anyone a shining hero. It is the magic of the unreal world in which he operates.

So yes, Mr. Mukasey, Mr. Lieberman, and Mr. Chertoff, I shall make friends out of you.

But until that time, I need you to know that I know full well what you are, who you work for, and what you're up to.

Fortunately, those behaviors are not inherent to your souls. ...And that is why I can make friends of you.

But for now, I am extremely displeased with your perfidy.

Where did the state go?

I purchased my law education --such that it is-- for ten dollars. I bought a Black's Law Dictionary for five dollars at a yard sale, and I bought a five-dollar pass to the library at Stetson University in DeLand, Florida. In the basement there I pored over leather-bound books that perhaps had informed the very Enlightenment thinkers who formed the several states. Some of these books were PRINTED in the mid 1700s. I'm thinking of opening my own practice now. I certainly can't be any less informed than Alberto Gonzales.

What is the State? The state is a body politic. It is a political union among men. It is considered to be comprised of men, a territory, and a government through which the political power of its members is expressed.

Men existed before the state. They each possessed the right to express their own political power. Men created the state. Therefore, the state is subordinate and may be discarded when it no longer serves its intended function.

Its intended function is its "original, animating force." What is this original, animating force of the state? The defense of property. This property includes physical things like cows, firewood, and corn. It also includes intangible things like rights. I have a right to live, to work, to travel, to be secure in my privacy, and to conduct myself in a manner that does not infringe upon others' enjoyment of their property.

This defense of property is the animating force of the state.

In a state of nature, I have the right to defend my property. I do not have the right to appropriate another's property. My individual political power may be righteously used only to defend my property, both physical and intangible.

The state, as a collection of individuals' political power, is merely an expression of that power on a larger and exclusive scale. It has no moral claim to additional power; it cannot claim, for example, a power to steal from one to give to another. This power is not retained by the individual in a state of nature. Therefore, a collection of those individual political powers confers no such right upon the state. What the individual cannot do in a state of nature, the state may not do.

The state claims exclusive operation with a territory. The presumption is that such a claim of exclusivity is owed to the righteously operating state. This is known as territorial jurisdiction. "Within this territory, what we say goes. ...Presumably because we have a right to say what goes."

What is this right to say what goes? That is, what gives the state a moral claim to exclusively operate within a territory? That moral claim is that there ought not be any competitors because the state is performing its assigned function.

But what happens when the state does not perform its assigned function? It loses the moral claim to the exclusive operation within a territory.

The State of Vermont, for example, does nothing. Anything that is produced within this territory is produced by the people. Farmers, factory workers, et cetera. The State of Vermont cannot even perform its most basic functions in defending the members of that political union from criminals who would steal their intangible property. Criminals roam free in this territory. The State does nothing to stop them.

Taxes are protection money paid to the mutual defense organization, the state. They are paid under the expectation that the state will perform its assigned function. Because if it does not, then the economically rational being will pay someone else who will.

Governor Douglas --whom I do not know and of whom I have no opinion-- visited Bellows Falls the other day to see about paying for a new recreation center. While I appreciate his desire to improve things, I am paying that security provider --the state-- to perform its assigned function. I am not paying the state to use its political power to extract under force of arms money to build a new rec center. This is an attempted use of power which the state lacks. It is a perverted, immoral use of the state. It is unlawful. "We hereby constitute the state to provide for the common defense... and to build rec centers."

So the state is busying itself building rec centers while doing nothing to stop the roaming free of criminals within the territory.

The state retired itself. It voluntarily relinquished any claim to the exclusive operation within the territory. It now possesses only in personam jurisdiction over the members of the political union. Its territorial jurisdiction --it would seem-- has ceased to exist.

The failure of a state to enforce The Law within its territory has led to the disappearance of the very concept of territorial jurisdiction.

In the Post 9-11 World --where it is abundantly clear to any who may care to investigate the matter that lawlessness abounds-- the very notion of territorial jurisdiction was extinguished.

Where the states no longer possess a moral claim to territorial jurisdiction, and where a goodly number of persons within a territory are no longer to be considered reasonable persons --and where those unreasonable persons will permit their political power to take on a deranged expression-- the reasonable person is free to join another political union.

And thus was born the Privatized Political Union. United Sovereigns of America is one such political union. It exists to provide for the defense of its members' property, both physical and intangible. It possesses no powers that the individual would not possess in a state of nature.

The Penny Shiners of the world have been for the past hundred years or more attempting to change American law in order to steal the property, both physical and intangible, of the people.

9-11 was to have been their catalyzing event to usher in the Super State. Political unions through history have progressed from the individual, to the family, to the clan, to the village, to the city-state, to the nation-state, and was supposed to progress to the Super State --a one-world government.

The miscalculation in their plans was that it would not be discovered that 9-11 was an inside job.

Everyone in my audience knows this. We're all adults here.

When neither the state, nor the several states, choose to do anything about this unlawful activity, those states deliver to the reasonable person the permission to provide for the defense of his property by other means.

So the delicious joke in all this is that --far from ushering into existence the Super State-- 9-11 caused the state to destroy itself and, thus, any legal link to a Super State.

The most significant effect of 9-11 --or, more precisely, the effect of the states' inaction in its aftermath-- is that the very notion of territorial jurisdiction ceased to exist. Much like Alberto Gonzales accidentally caused the United States to cease to exist, the Penny Shiners accidentally caused the notion of the state to cease to exist.

This is the most significant legal development in hundreds of years.

Do I get a comedy prize now?

Criminals seize real money.

Liberty Dollar Company Announcement
Thursday, November 15, 2007

Dear Liberty Dollar Supporters:

I sincerely regret to inform you that about 8 this morning a dozen FBI and Secret Service agents raided the Liberty Dollar office in Evansville, Indiana.

For approximately six hours they took all the gold, all the silver, all the platinum, and almost two tons of Ron Paul Dollars that were just delivered last Friday. They also took all the files and computers and froze our bank accounts.

Link

If I remember correctly, the Liberty Dollar is a privately-issued coin of silver or gold. Or they issue several coins. I don't recall. They do not purport to be United States coins. They're privately issued. And remember: The people are free to trade hat pins among themselves if they want to. And since the United States fiat "dollar" will shortly fall to zero value, one might expect that the people will wish to dump that fiat currency and transfer their wealth to other currencies like the Euro, gold coins, tobacco, pork bellies, or perhaps even hat pins.

The point is, the criminal organization known as the US Treasury --which is in the business of issuing garbage money, contrary to the Constitution-- has taken exception to the Liberty Dollar. Their rationale for harassing this organization is that some unwitting person might be "duped" into accepting a Liberty coin where they expect to accept a US coin. You mean I might accidently receive a coin that contains real silver or gold as opposed to the junk metal in the United States coins? If I could only be so lucky...

This raid is a desperate, final attempt by a dying empire to prop up the value of its "money" by forcibly putting coin makers, pork belly traders, and hat pin manufacturers out of business.

And it's embarrassing to watch.

P.S. If you're smart, you will immediately dump that pig currency known as the "dollar." The fiat dollar's value comes from its status as world reserve currency. Because once upon a time, the US had the military power to force Middle Eastern oil-producing nations to sell their oil only for dollars. This enabled the US to print as many dollars as it wished and to export those dollars. The US has been getting a free ride for some decades by exporting its inflation.

But now the US no longer has an army. It lacks the ability to compel oil-producing nations to price their oil in dollars. Therefore, no country needs dollars. (Neither to buy oil, nor to buy anything from the US, since the US no longer makes anything.)

So when you lack an army, your fiat reserve currency's value goes to zero.

"Stop...doing nothing."

"You are...a threat...for doing nothing..."

Armed police deployed

Mr Gaubert said he was on his way to meet friends when he suffered a fit on the bus and slipped into a [diabetic] coma which left him slumped on his seat clutching his rucksack.

Armed police were called to the bus depot in Headingley and when he failed to respond to their challenges he was shot with the Taser.

He said as this was happening, another officer was pointing a real gun at his head.

He was restrained and eventually came round in the police van.

He said it was only then that the officers realised it was a medical emergency, despite him wearing a medical tag round his neck to warn of his condition, and took him to hospital.

Link

You know that your minds have been warped when you begin to see terriss everywhere. Diabetic comas are an everyday occurrence. "Terrorists" do not exist (except the ones who work for government. But they're not the kind to draw attention to themselves on buses.)

Time was, that if a cop found an unresponsive person, it was ASSUMED that the person was in a diabetic coma.

Now just tase them.

"You wake up, damn you."

"We am here to protect you."

"Stop...doing nothing."

"You are...a threat...for doing nothing..."

Armed police deployed

Mr Gaubert said he was on his way to meet friends when he suffered a fit on the bus and slipped into a [diabetic] coma which left him slumped on his seat clutching his rucksack.

Armed police were called to the bus depot in Headingley and when he failed to respond to their challenges he was shot with the Taser.

He said as this was happening, another officer was pointing a real gun at his head.

He was restrained and eventually came round in the police van.

He said it was only then that the officers realised it was a medical emergency, despite him wearing a medical tag round his neck to warn of his condition, and took him to hospital.

Link

You know that your minds have been warped when you begin to see terriss everywhere. Diabetic comas are an everyday occurrence. "Terrorists" do not exist (except the ones who work for government. But they're not the kind to draw attention to themselves on buses.)

Time was, that if a cop found an unresponsive person, it was ASSUMED that the person was in a diabetic coma.

Now just tase them.

"You wake up, damn you."

"We am here to protect you."

Can you see the fear in his eyes?

When GOP presidential hopeful Rudy Giuliani stopped off for a little retail politicking at a Colorado coffee house last Saturday, he came prepared to hammer home his commitment to the war on terror, make a jab or two at Hillary Clinton, and field some tough questions about recently indicted pal Bernard Kerik -- but he apparently wasn't ready for Sander Hicks.

Hicks, a Brooklyn-based journalist, publisher and all-around multimedia maverick, is also a self-described member of the "9/11 Truth" movement, a group convinced that official explanations do not fully account for the Sept. 11 tragedies. As Giuliani shook hands and signed autographs outside of Loveland, Colorado's Loveland Coffee Company, Hicks was waiting with a question.

"Mr. Giuliani, six years ago you told Peter Jennings that 'we were told that the World Trade Center was going to collapse,'" Hicks said, quoting a remark from the former New York City mayor made during an interview with ABC News. "Where did you get your foreknowledge that the World Trade Center was going to collapse?"

...

"Hicks appears to be trying to resuscitate the claim that Rudy knew the Towers were going to collapse in advance," states an entry at the blog Screw Loose Change, a site which claims to debunk "myths" about Sept. 11. "EMS Battalion Chief John Peruggia was warned by a NYC building engineer at 9:58 AM that the North Tower was in imminent danger of collapse. Presumably either Peruggia or the building engineer proceeded to warn the Mayor. Unfortunately Giuliani has compounded the problem by denying that he had any advance knowledge, perhaps because the kooks generally frame it that he had plenty of warning..."

Link

Just to recap for any worker drones who may have wandered in:

It is not theoretically possible for the WTC towers to have collapsed from the kinetic energy of the planes and the thermal energy of the burning fuel and office contents. Translation: It didn't happen that way. The energy deficit was likely made up with demolitions charges. This squares with Larry Silverstein's admission that they made the decision to "pull" bldg 7. This also squares with Rudy Giuliani's advance warning. (Of whatever duration. It makes no difference whether it's ten minutes or ten microseconds. Foreknowledge is foreknowledge.)

And further: What building engineer would ever suspect that a steel-framed building would collapse from fire? It had NEVER happened before. (And not one, not two, but three steel-framed buildings collapsed from "fire," all on the same day, all on the same piece of property, all owned by the same guy.

Huh.

• Giuliani has ties to Israel and to Department of Homeland Security (via Kerik.)
• Homeland Security has ties to Michael Chertoff, who oversaw the writing of the PATRIOT Act --that just magically happened to be already written and waiting in the wings. And he has ties to Israel.
• Larry Silverstein, I'm guessing, has ties to Israel.
• McGreevey's Little Boyfriend, Israeli intelligence agent, has ties to DHS --his coveted New Jersey DHS post.
  

All skid marks lead to Israel.

I just can't find a single Muslim in this whole mix.

I'm so kookie for demanding facts and logic and reason. I know it's not fashionable. I'm a man out of time, apparently.

Just how far are you people willing to take party loyalty?

On a 224-192 vote, largely along party lines, the House adopted its proposal to update the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. The measure, known as the RESTORE Act, would replace a temporary FISA update approved in August.

The bill does not include a provision to grant legal immunity to telecommunications companies that the Bush administration has demanded and it restores the role of the FISA court in approving surveillance methods used by the National Security Agency that could ensnare Americans.

Link

This is the problem with political parties. Someone has "sold" you on the notion of party loyalty. Follow the most senior party member through thick and thin, the American Way be damned? "Well, the President is the most senior Republican, so I'll stick by him or I'll be in trouble." The President runs nothing. The people who control Presidents are not Democrats or Republicans. They have no national or party affiliation. They are dismantling your system of law so that they can arrange things to their benefit.

What's the ratio of Democrats to Republicans in the House? I don't know; for simplicity's sake let's say 3 to 2. How many Representatives do we have? Four hundred and thirty-five?

By your short-sighted adherence to parties, you have reduced the quantity of the debate and the viewpoints and the wisdom of 435 persons down to five.

You have a House of Representatives populated by five people, three of whom vote one way and two of whom vote another. (If we assume 3:2 Democrat to Republican, for simple argument's sake.)

Political parties should be smashed just like labor unions.

The question, "What's your party affiliation" is as idiotic as, "What's your major?"

Arrange furniture wrong? Get killed.

Here is a video of oh-so-brave Royal Canadian Mounted Police tasering to death a non-violent furniture arranger.

Do you suppose that a kind word or a cup of coffee or even a pair of handcuffs might have calmed down this disoriented and perhaps mentally unstable man?

Tasers are part of the new police SOP as "pain compliance" devices, as in, "Do what we say or you get pain."

Here's an interesting moral conundrum: For those with heart conditions --like me-- does the threat of being tased warrant an equal or superior use of force to defend oneself from fat, lazy cops?

This is rich.

Supporters of former attorney general Alberto R. Gonzales have created a trust fund to help pay for his legal expenses, which are mounting in the face of an ongoing Justice Department investigation into whether Gonzales committed perjury or improperly tampered with a congressional witness.

The establishment of a legal defense fund for the nation's former chief law enforcement officer underscores the potential peril confronting Gonzales, who is one of a handful of attorneys general to face potential criminal charges for actions taken in office.

Link

While in office, the man did everything in his power to subvert the rule of law and to dismantle the legal protections afforded the accused. He pretended never to have heard of Habeas Corpus, detailed precisely how it would be considered legal to torture children in front of their parents, and argued that the President had the authority to break any and all laws in pursuit of some shape-shifting rationale known as "defending the country."

If I were as grotesque a monster as this piece of filth, I would advocate throwing him into a hole, waterboarding him, subjecting him to sensory deprivation and mind-altering drugs, and forcing him to eat his own shit --all of which are the stinking fruits of his malformed, birth-defect existence.

But, alas, I cannot. I suppose even the most degenerate form of sociopath deserves the due process he so assiduously strove to eliminate.

Let his own soul --if he has one-- torture itself until the day this earth is finally rid of it and hell incinerates it as so much human garbage.

His crimes are self-evident. What class of person could be a "supporter?"

OK. Let's recap about the compressed audio.

I don't watch cable television. Anything I want to watch I can see on the internet. I sit at the table in my lair and recline in a high-backed chair and watch shows on my notebook computer. (I will foreshadow a bit here by noting that the mute button on my notebook is never more than three inches and a short finger-flick away.)

When the audio level of the programming is suddenly interrupted by too-loud, compressed audio of an advertisement, I effortlessly flick the mute button. Why? Because it's too fuckin' loud, that's why.

Then, since I cannot hear the audio and now have little idea of what the advertisement is about, my eyes will wander away from the screen and to the barbie dolls, the tinfoil hat, and the hand-lettered "VIACOM SUCKS" placard that I have been promising myself I will work into a bit somewhere. Or maybe the magazine lying on the floor. Or the numerous flag lapel pins that I bought out of a bucket at the liquidation store.

The point is, my attention is everywhere except the advertisement.

It's really OK: Stop compressing the audio.

Just stop.

Puzzle Piece Nos. 3382, 5120, and 6516

Judith Regan, the book publisher who was fired by the News Corporation last year, asserts in a lawsuit filed today that a senior executive at the media conglomerate encouraged her to mislead federal investigators about her relationship with Bernard B. Kerik during his bid to become homeland security secretary in late 2004.

The lawsuit asserts that the News Corporation executive wanted to protect the presidential aspirations of former Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani, Mr. Kerik’s mentor, who had appointed him New York City police commissioner and had recommended him for the federal post.

Link

And:

“On or about June 13, 2003, ‘John Doe #7,’ a Brooklyn businessman, made a personal loan of $250,000 to Bernard B. Kerik (‘the John Doe #7 loan’). As Kerik well knew, john doe #7 obtained the funds with which to make the loan to kerik by in turn taking a loan from ‘John Doe #8,’ a wealthy Israeli industrialist whose companies did business with the federal government.”

Link

And let's not forget about McGreevey's Little Boyfriend, the Israeli intelligence agent who had his dear, little heart set on a top New Jersey Department of Homeland Security post.

The pattern emerges: DHS = Israel's Provincial American Government

If...

...upon telling an employee that I would like him to finish designing that back-office interface code so that I can get the demo ready for a prospective investor... if he were to say:

"But I'm supposed to go on break now,"

I would invite him not to return from his break.

It's not the breaks that are the issue. Trust me: He will be amply rewarded for his efforts. It's the inflexibility. You cannot move quickly and profitably when everyone is following some kind of rule book.

You know you're over the target when you start taking serious fire.

On Tuesday, November 6, 2007, a House Homeland Security Subcommittee had a hearing on "Terrorism and the Internet".* The hearing featured presentations from several groups, including a former employee of the RAND Corporation, and Mark Weitzman of the Simon Wiesenthal Center. The hearing was chaired by Democratic Rep. Jane Harman, and ranking Republican, Rep. Dave Reichert.

Toward the end of the hearing, Weitzman rolls out a PowerPoint presentation that presents a few 9/11 truth sites sandwiched in between websites that offer training in terrorist tactics, and a website that glorified the attack of 9/11. Among the websites presented under the heading "Internet: Incubator of 9/11 Conpiracies and Disinformation", are Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, and other sites, such as Killtown's, who brought this Hearing to our attention.

Link

You see that it must be so, that 9-11 Truth sites be classified as Terris Incubators. Because when it becomes widely known that Israel played --at the very least-- an instrumental role in 9-11, then, obviously, Israel's fortunes will be...attenuated...

And T-shirt sales at the Simon Wiesenthal Boo Hoo Center for Woe Is Us Studies will kind of taper off. ...Probably causing budgetary problems...

(And by the way, Mr. Weitzman might have been better off replacing Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth --about as respectable and dispassionately technical a site as you can imagine-- he might have replaced it with It Was the Jews! It Has to Be, Or Else We Can't Eat Them! From a show biz perspective, it's just more satisfyingly dastardly sounding.)

Yup. I'd say the New World Order is on the ropes, alright.

For Bill O'Reilly, ambushing your political enemies with a video camera is just fine, as long as the camera is pointed in the opposite direction.

Blogger Mike Stark has a history of haranguing O'Reilly during his call-in radio show, and he once visited the Fox host's house to mock him over sexual harassment allegations. And now Stark, 39, has become the target of a network executive working on behalf of the combative Fox News pundit. Fox VP Dianne Brandi has written to the dean of the Univeristy of Virginia's law school, where Stark is in his second year, urging an investigation of his conduct.

Link

O'Reilly, Hannity, Limbaugh... they're all starting to get scared of their masters' impending exposure. You can see it in their eyes... I can.

Why does the substance eater talk?

Privacy no longer can mean anonymity, says [Kerr]. Instead, it should mean that government and businesses properly safeguard people’s private communications and financial information.

Kerr’s comments come as Congress is taking a second look at the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.

Link

Privacy means that neither this substance eater nor his penny-shining masters have access to information that has nothing to do with them.

Privacy means anonymity. Because if it doesn't, then you go away and we hire someone else to protect our property. Is that easy enough for you to understand? Because it's really pretty simple.

Moreover, it's difficult to justify any further infringement of privacy rights when your national intelligence can't even finger the true troglodytic perpetrators of 9-11. Just pretend that you're a pig; grunt and snort and root around in garbage and you'll find your guilty party soon enough.

Barbie in a state of nature.

Have I told you how queer I am?

I flit about like a little fairy and sashay down the street in search of hair care products.

I play up the gay angle to demonstrate that it is a very sad state of affairs when the fairies of the world are restoring lawful government.

Never in my most deranged nightmares did I ever suspect that the responsibility for playing the role of United States Alpha Male would fall to me.

And by the way,

when I describe to you my artistic process of not really knowing if anyone is in my audience, do not mistake that for some kind of hedging-of-bets posture. It's not, because intellectually I know full well who is in my audience.

• So the IRS can try to collect taxes from someone who doesn't know that it's an unlawful fraud,
• The State of Vermont and all other states can watch me exercise my right to travel, and
• Michael Mukasey and Joseph Lieberman and Michael Chertoff can all have a Barnyard Animal Party together, where they lament the short supply of three-year-old girls and nine-year-old boys to screw without becoming unclean.

And of my latest plan to initiate non-linearity? Maybe I'll draw up the legal documents that detail the authority and evidence by which I indict several members of the Bush Administration. Then I'll travel to DC to deliver arrest warrants for them. (It should make great news, what with the numerous Pandora's Boxes of mine spewing forth their contents. We can have news cameras watch me roll into town and march up to the gate of the White House. And any decent members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff can assign military men to deliver to me the objects of my warrants. How's that sound?)

Chris King Pop Icon comin' to town... And I defy anyone to resist my moral authority.

Non-linearity is imminent. Get ready.

I guess standards have slipped around here recently.

American military chiefs have been left dumbstruck by an undetected Chinese submarine popping up at the heart of a recent Pacific exercise and close to the vast U.S.S. Kitty Hawk - a 1,000ft supercarrier with 4,500 personnel on board.

By the time it surfaced the 160ft Song Class diesel-electric attack submarine is understood to have sailed within viable range for launching torpedoes or missiles at the carrier.

Link

What decade do you think this is? You're not fighting rice farmers for your penny-shining masters anymore. You're up against the Sunburn missile and skilled submariners. A carrier battle group is of zero value any longer.

If there is a shooting war in the Middle East, you will lose. Each of those ships will be sunk within thirty minutes. And then we'll not only be out an army, but half the Pacific Fleet will be at the bottom of the ocean.

Now I know that Admirals don't come too bright these days. You apparently believe your own Global War on Terror(R) marketing. So before you get bait-and-switched yet again, let me tell you that USG LLC and Israel are setting you up. They will sacrifice one or more of your expensive, obsolete carrier battle groups in order to prime the waterworks pump for a strike on Iran and/or Syria.

Not to mention that while all you war heroes were off playing tough guys, the United States has ceased to exist.

So either you're too stupid to realize who has attacked the nation, or the War on Globa' Terra business on the Pacific Fleet website indicates that you're in on it.

Which is worse?

...Completely fuckin' useless...

One